Defiant protesters put government in a dither [The Hindu]
Kallidichavila residents say the quarry is a source of drinking water in the entire area.
Spirited protest by local people at Kallidichavila, near here, on Thursday put paid to the attempt by the district administration to carry out activities preparatory to dumping garbage in an abandoned quarry in the area.
The quarry at Kallidichavila is one of the three in the capital city selected by the State government to deposit garbage. In all, the government has identified 20 quarries in the city for the purpose.
Well before the team of Revenue officials led by RDO Mohammed Mustafa and officials of the Suchitwa Mission — escorted by a posse of policemen — reached the quarry, scores of men women and children had gathered on the road leading to the site.
By 10.15 a.m., when the convoy of vehicles bearing the officials and policemen was sighted, dozens of agitators ran forward and squatted on the road to prevent the vehicles from moving forward.
The RDO’s request to the agitators to disperse was met with angry response from the leaders of various political parties, including the local Corporation councillor, G. Vinod. “I know your house is at Vembayam. There is a quarry nearby. Why don’t you first take garbage to that quarry,” Mr. Vinod asked the RDO. “Why were you not able to take garbage to Vilappilsala,” he asked.
Soon after, the agitators brought forward young children and seated them on the frontlines of the protest. Local leaders of the CPI(M), Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) who addressed the agitators warned that any attempt by the district administration to use force against the people would have dire consequences.
M.A Vaheed, MLA, who reached the spot an hour later told the agitators that the proposal to dump garbage in quarries was an unscientific one. He pledged his support to the agitation and promised to take up the issue with the government.
Close to two hours after the official convoy reached Kallidichavila, the agitation was over, with the RDO announcing that the Revenue team was going back.
Residents of Kallidichavila who spoke to The Hindu pointed out that contrary to what government officials had been saying, the quarry served as a source of drinking water to the entire area.
“The wells of the local people were perennially full because of the water in the quarry,” said Abdul Kalam, a local resident. “It is wrong to think that this quarry contains only rainwater. There is a bountiful upsurge of groundwater in the quarry. If garbage is dumped here, the results would be nothing short of disastrous for the local people,” he added.
Others too were of the view that the prudent step would be to protect this quarry as a source of drinking water instead of dumping garbage in it.
“All these problems have come about because we were made part of the Corporation. Maybe we should go back to being a panchayat,” an agitator added.
Grappling with Garbage
Courtesy: Clean India Journal
If uric acid odour is an indicator of a urinal nearby, a homemaker in Kerala’s Vilappilsala village suggests new visitors to follow the rotting garbage stench to find their way to the village
Thiruvananthapuram City Corporation’s plan to convert a part of this once idyllic, palm-fringed village of limpid backwaters – Vilappilsala – into a garbage dump has created unrest among the villagers.
Six months ago, a group of villagers and environmental activists physically stopped trucks from unloading the city garbage on a 54-acre site acquired by the Corporation in Vilappilsala for an aerobic waste composting plant.
Although the corporation is now armed with an order from the Kerala High Court to reopen the plant, it does not have the courage to face the irate villagers.
An enquiry commission appointed by the court has substantiated allegations by the villagers that the waste from the composting site was leaching into streams, wells and water sources in the village.
“Many of the villagers have been suffering from stomach and respiratory problems ever since they started dumping the garbage here,” said Shobhana Kumari, president of the panchayat (village local body). “We are not going to allow city garbage to be dumped in our village,” she said.
What is happening at Vilappilsala is indicative of a malaise that is gripping the whole of India – an inability to deal with the mountains of garbage generated by rapid urbanisation.
India framed a solid waste policy in 2000 on the orders of the Supreme Court, which required all cities to implement comprehensive waste-management programmes that would include household collection of segregated waste, recycling and composting.
However, no city has been able to set up any programme like that envisaged in the policy. Indian cities generate more than 50 million tonnes of solid waste a year, and on average, each urban resident produces half a kilogramme of waste daily.
The Energy and Resources Institute in New Delhi estimates that by 2047 waste generation in the cities will touch 260 million tonnes per year, with local governments unable to handle the problem.
Commenting on the mass dumping of urban waste in rural areas, as is being attempted in Vilappilsala,
C R Neelakantan, environmental activist in Kerala, said that this is “unconscionable and violates the ‘polluter pays’ principle.”
One solution, increasingly finding favour with local governments, is contracting out waste handling to private waste incinerator operators – though environmentalists say this is a remedy worse than the disease.
“Incinerators cost 12-43 times more than simple, easily-managed, low-cost composting, which is the ideal solution for a country like India,” said Almitra Patel, a member of the Supreme Court committee on solid waste management.
“Unlike in developed countries where waste is segregated and has high calorie packaging that works well with incinerators, Indian waste is high in organics and moisture and has very low calorific content,” Patel said.
“Thermodynamically there is no surplus energy available after deducting processing energy needs and that rules out waste-to-energy incinerators,” she said.
Indian waste also has a high proportion of inert materials such as street dust and drain silt that damage waste-conveying equipment and the incineration chambers. An incinerator set up in New Delhi’s Timarpur area packed up within a week and has been lying inoperative for years. Yet, Delhi went on to allow a private contractor to build a larger ‘waste-to-energy’ incinerator with a capacity to handle 2,000 tonnes of solid waste daily, ignoring protests by residents of the Okhla area who fear that the thick smoke billowing out of its smokestacks will harm their health.
“Government must enforce controls, starting with segregation of waste and monitoring of emissions for toxic by products such as dioxins, furans and respirable particulate matter before allowing incinerators to come up in residential areas,” Ravi Agarwal, chief of Toxic Links, a major environment NGO, said. Lack of waste segregation is a serious issue in India, with everything from electronic waste to hazardous biomedical refuse from hospitals ending up in the same stream.
A study carried out in 2010 by the Indian Institute of Management in Lucknow for the Central Pollution Control Board found that 50% of biomedical waste generated in India’s hospitals gets dumped along with municipal garbage.
Jose Joseph, executive director of the ‘Clean City’ movement in Kerala’s port city of Kochi, has said that better understanding between manufacturers and consumers about the use and recycling of products will go a long way in solving the growing problem of waste disposal. Green economists have suggested that what India needs is a comprehensive waste management and recycling strategy on the lines of Brazil’s national solid waste policy.
K. Lathanathan, a green activist, has suggested that recycling and energy recovery from waste are profitable even if there are issues of decent work involved. “It is worth considering that recycling in all its forms employs 12 million people in Brazil, China and the United States.”